- Registriert
- 1. Januar 2011
- Beiträge
- 1.374
- Reaktionspunkte
- 1.564
- Punkte
- 373
Nein das stimmt denke ich nicht. Ja die Instanz wird vielleicht vergeben an diejenige die interuptable maschines nutzen, aber wenn du wieder auf Start klickst bekommst du die Maschine wieder. Du zahlst ja den on demand Preis (und zahlt man denke ich auch wenn die Maschine gestoppt ist).
EDIT: das steht im FAQ:
I stopped my instance, and now when I try to restart it the status is stuck on "scheduling". What is wrong?
When you stop an instance, the gpu(s) it was using may get reassigned. When you later then try to restart the instance, it tries to get those gpu(s) back - that is the "scheduling" phase. If another high priority job is currently using any of the same gpu(s), your instance will be stuck in "scheduling" phase until the conflicting jobs are done. We know this is not ideal, and we are working on ways to migrate containers across gpus and machines, but until then we recommend not stopping an instance unless you are ok with the risk of waiting a while to restart it.
When you stop an instance, the gpu(s) it was using may get reassigned. When you later then try to restart the instance, it tries to get those gpu(s) back - that is the "scheduling" phase. If another high priority job is currently using any of the same gpu(s), your instance will be stuck in "scheduling" phase until the conflicting jobs are done. We know this is not ideal, and we are working on ways to migrate containers across gpus and machines, but until then we recommend not stopping an instance unless you are ok with the risk of waiting a while to restart it.
Habs auch schon gehabt das connect dort stand und trotzdem meine Verbindug möglich war, so ca. 10 Minuten später gings wieder (Maschine war vorher abgestürtzt)
Zuletzt bearbeitet: