Info Oscam rejected group

[enrico_it]

Ciao a tutti, torno a importunarvi su quello che è sicuramente un tema già trattato in passato: ammetto di aver guardato qualche post in merito ma francamente non capisco la causa del malfunzionamento che riscontro.
Nel fritz, su cui gira felicemente oscam, ho voluto provare a passare ad una versione piu' aggiornata cioè dalla 4927 alla 7500 (e poi anche alla 8200, senza alcuna miglioria) ma ho subito riscontrato il problema del "rejected group". E premetto che la configurazione è sempre la medesima della versione 4927 dove il problema si non si manifesta se non sporadicamente. E' sicuramente un problema nella rete interna, quindi di oscam visti i tempi dell'ordine del millisecondo quello che non capisco è perchè solo con le ultime versioni di oscam il problema diventa cosi' evidente. Ecco un log esplicativo:

2013/03/06 17:04:19 63C000 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0000/0E2E/B7:679E): rejected group (2 ms) (0/0/0/2) (no matching reader)
2013/03/06 17:04:24 63C000 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0000/0E2E/B7:459C): rejected group (3 ms) (0/0/0/2) (no matching reader)
2013/03/06 17:04:33 63C000 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0000/1FCC/B7:BD47): found (208 ms) by server2 (P/1/1/2)
2013/03/06 17:04:36 63C000 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0000/1FCC/B7450): found (681 ms) by server1 (P/1/1/2)
2013/03/06 17:04:37 63C000 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0000/0E2E/B7:3DB5): rejected group (2 ms) (0/0/0/2) (no matching reader)
2013/03/06 17:04:43 63C000 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0000/0E2E/B7:F890): rejected group (3 ms) (0/0/0/2) (no matching reader)
2013/03/06 17:04:53 63C000 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0000/0E2E/B7:93D7): rejected group (2 ms) (0/0/0/2) (no matching reader)
2013/03/06 17:05:03 63C000 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0000/0E2E/B7:3FA0): rejected group (4 ms) (0/0/0/2) (no matching reader)
2013/03/06 17:05:11 63C000 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0000/0E2E/B7:A16B): rejected group (4 ms) (0/0/0/2) (no matching reader)
2013/03/06 17:05:11 63C000 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0000/1FCC/B7:014F): found (202 ms) by server2 (P/1/1/2)
2013/03/06 17:05:16 63C000 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0000/1FCC/B7897): found (635 ms) by server1 (P/1/1/2)
2013/03/06 17:05:25 63C000 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0000/1FCC/B7:3587): found (156 ms) by server2 (P/1/1/2)
2013/03/06 17:05:36 63C000 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0000/1FCC/B7:F7BD): found (647 ms) by server1 (P/1/1/2)
2013/03/06 17:05:45 63C000 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0000/1FCC/B7:3166): found (161 ms) by server2 (P/1/1/2)
2013/03/06 17:05:54 63C000 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0000/0E2E/B7:76A4): rejected group (2 ms) (0/0/0/2) (no matching reader)
2013/03/06 17:06:03 63C000 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0000/0E2E/B7:42A7): rejected group (3 ms) (0/0/0/2) (no matching reader)
2013/03/06 17:06:13 63C000 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0000/0E2E/B7:5262): rejected group (3 ms) (0/0/0/2) (no matching reader)
2013/03/06 17:06:23 63C000 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0000/0E2E/B7:C61F): rejected group (3 ms) (0/0/0/2) (no matching reader)
2013/03/06 17:06:33 63C000 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0000/0E2E/B7:C1B7): rejected group (4 ms) (0/0/0/2) (no matching reader)

Spoiler

2013/02/24 14:14:39 1C08 c box-ip23 (09CD&000000/0E2F/B7:A85B): found (202 ms) by server2 (of 1 avail 2)
2013/02/24 14:14:42 1C08 c box-ip23 (09CD&000000/1101/B7:B9A1): rejected reader peer (3067 ms) by server1 (of 2 avail 2)
2013/02/24 14:14:42 1C08 c box-ip23 (09CD&000000/1111/B7:2FCB): found (442 ms) by server2 (of 2 avail 2)


2013/02/24 15:20:51 2409 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0E2E/B7:205A): found (307 ms) by server1 (of 1 avail 2)
2013/02/24 15:21:02 2409 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0E2E/B773D): rejected reader peer (3008 ms) by server2 (of 1 avail 2)
2013/02/24 15:21:02 2409 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/1FCC/B7:B4E1): found (200 ms) by server2 (of 2 avail 2)


2013/02/24 19:00:41 2409 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0E2E/B7:34AB): found (220 ms) by server2 (of 1 avail 2)
2013/02/24 19:00:50 2409 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/0E2E/B7:40A1): rejected reader peer (383 ms) by server2 (of 1 avail 2)
2013/02/24 19:00:50 2409 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/1FCC/B7:7F2F): found (366 ms) by server1 (of 1 avail 2)

e poi non appare anche un rejected group:

Spoiler

2013/02/24 18:25:32 2409 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/2C90/B7:5867): found (181 ms) by server2 (of 2 avail 2)
2013/02/24 18:25:38 2409 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/1101/B717E): rejected group (2 ms) (of 0 avail 2) (no matching reader)
2013/02/24 18:25:41 2409 c box-ip22 (09CD&000000/05B9/B7:86AC): found (102 ms) by server2 (of 1 avail 2)

ecco la configurazione di oscam 4927 della quale posso solo dire che il lb_mode = 2 fa funzionare il tutto molto meglio che non con il lb_mode=0 delle prove precedenti (con lb_mode=0 avevo messo i pesi diversi per i 2 server perchè mi ero accorto che il problema del rejected reader peer si presentava piu' spesso con il server1 (e carta 93B) che mediamente aveva un ecm leggermente superiore al server2)




oscam.conf

Spoiler

[global]
logfile = stdout;/tmp/oscam.log
nice = -1
lb_mode = 2

[monitor]
port = 0
nocrypt =
hideclient_to = 15
appendchaninfo = 0

[cccam]
port = 13333
ignorereshare = 1
version = 2.0.11
minimizecards = 2
stealth = 1
reshare_mode = 1

[webif]
httpport = portawebif
httpuser = userwebif
httppwd = passwebif
httprefresh = 5
httpallowed = ip-abilitati

oscam.server

Spoiler

[reader]
label = tvsat_reader
enable = 1
protocol = cccam
device = ip decoder che uso per leggere la card tivsat tramite cccam e linea F:,porta decoder
user = fonera-ip3
password = fonera-ip3
reconnecttimeout = 2
caid = 183D
group = 1
lb_weight = 1000
cccversion = 2.2.1



[reader]
label = server1
enable = 1
protocol = cccam
device = ip1,porta2
user = xxx
password = yyy
group = 2
lb_weight = 5
cccversion = 2.2.1
ccckeepalive = 1


[reader]
label = server2
enable = 1
protocol = cccam
device = ip2,porta2
user = aaa
password = bbb
group = 2
lb_weight = 50
cccversion = 2.2.1
ccckeepalive = 1

oscam.user

Spoiler

[account]
user = box-ip22
pwd = box-ip22
group = 1,2
caid = 183D,09CD

[account]
user = box-ip23
pwd = box-ip23
group = 1,2
caid = 183D,09CD

[account]
user = ciccio
pwd = ciccio
group = 1
caid = 183D

[account]
user = paolo
pwd = paolo
group = 1
caid = 183D

Grazie a tutti!

 

[elcoro]

AW: Oscam rejected group

potevi continuare sul tuo primo post perché aprirne un altro?

 

[enrico_it]

AW: Oscam rejected group

infatti ci avevo anche pensato, ma temevo di ricevere risposte del tipo che sono OT.
Vabè, oramai è aperto.....che ci devo fa'!

 

[crazyrolf]

AW: Oscam rejected group

[reader]
label = server1
enable = 1
protocol = cccam
device = ip1,porta2
user = xxx
password = yyy
group = 2
lb_weight = 5
cccversion = 2.2.1
ccckeepalive = 1


[reader]
label = server2
enable = 1
protocol = cccam
device = ip2,porta2
user = aaa
password = bbb
group = 2
lb_weight = 50
cccversion = 2.2.1
ccckeepalive = 1

Beide Reader haben group = 2
das wird nichts.


[reader]
label = server1
enable = 1
protocol = cccam
device = ip1,porta2
user = xxx
password = yyy
group = 2
lb_weight = 5
cccversion = 2.2.1
ccckeepalive = 1


[reader]
label = server2
enable = 1
protocol = cccam
device = ip2,porta2
user = aaa
password = bbb
group = 3
lb_weight = 50
cccversion = 2.2.1
ccckeepalive = 1

und die user anpassen
group = 1,2,3

 

[enrico_it]

AW: Oscam rejected group

So, the rejected group problems it's caused because both readers have the same group, 2? and if i change configuration choosing for example one reader peer as fallback reader ? in this case both readers, server 1 and server 2 must have the same group as reported in streamboard....or not?:
"Define reader as fallback, standard and fallback reader must have the same group, see group"